Skip to content
The Lima Xi Report — daily corridor intelligence, 06:00 HKT. · Subscribe free →
Platform
Live Hormuz scenario How it works The Lima Xi Report
Guides
Predictive freight intelligence The Tension Index Air cargo disruption
Solutions
Airlines & GSAs Freight Forwarders & 3PLs Shippers & BCOs Governments & Ports Design Partners
Company
Insights About & Careers Investors
Request access
For governments & port authorities

Plan twenty-year infrastructure for the world as it is.

Port and land-bridge investments rest on assumptions about corridor demand that must hold for two decades. Lima Xi models how disruption risk actually behaves — a forward view most infrastructure decisions are currently made without.

Corridor ResilienceMODEL
Primary corridor
Highest volume lane
95
HI
Secondary corridor
Alternate routing
67
MD
Tertiary corridor
Redundancy path
44
LO
Resilience score
Composite
0.74
NATIONAL SCALEILLUSTRATIVE
20+yrs
Typical planning horizon for major corridor infrastructure
41
Corridors modelled at national scale
14
Cascade effects traced per trigger event
3wks
Lead time demonstrated on the Hormuz escalation
The problem

Infrastructure planning still runs on historical trade data

Major port expansions and trade corridor investments are justified using historical flow data and long-range demand forecasts. Those models describe the past reliably but say very little about how resilient a corridor will be to the disruptions that increasingly define global trade.

Infrastructure planning

Stress-test before capital is committed

Model proposed port and land-bridge investment against disruption scenarios, not just projected volume — so resilience is priced in before the commitment is made.

  • 01Corridor resilience modelling per scenario
  • 02Disruption-adjusted demand assumptions
  • 03Evidence base for capital allocation
Corridor Resilience · ScenarioMODEL
Baseline throughput
Historical projection
100%
Under sustained disruption
30-day scenario
72%
With alternate corridor
Mitigation modelled
91%
Resilience score
Composite
0.74
RESILIENCE MODELILLUSTRATIVE
Ports · Policy

From port strategy to national resilience

Understand how upstream disruption cascades into port-level congestion and national trade exposure, in terms treasury and policy teams can act on.

  • 01Upstream cascade into port congestion
  • 02National trade exposure quantified
  • 03Supports resilience policy reporting
National Exposure · WatchlistLIVE
Primary trade corridor
Highest volume lane
95
HI
Secondary corridor
Alternate routing
67
MD
Tertiary corridor
Redundancy path
44
LO
Composite exposure
National level
ELEVATED
41 CORRIDORSUPDATED 06:00 HKT
Proof point

A three-week head start on Hormuz

When tension escalated in the Strait of Hormuz, Lima Xi's cascade model flagged corridor risk roughly three weeks ahead of market-wide impact — enough lead time to act before it became common knowledge.

Read the full case study →
Lead time · Hormuz escalationBACKTEST
Lima Xi flags corridor risk
Cascade model trigger
T−21d
Fuel pressure forecast
11 corridors affected
T−20d
Market reprices
Observed rate movement
T+0
Actionable lead time
Window to reposition
~3 wks
HISTORICAL BACKTESTILLUSTRATIVE
Frequently asked

Questions from your desk

If yours is not here, ask us directly.

Ask a question
What does Lima Xi offer governments and port authorities?

Corridor-level trade risk intelligence for national infrastructure planning, port capacity strategy and supply chain resilience policy — modelling how global disruptions cascade into national trade exposure.

Is Lima Xi relevant to projects like land bridges or new port developments?

Yes. Large infrastructure investments depend on assumptions about future corridor demand and resilience. Lima Xi's scenario modelling informs those assumptions with forward-looking intelligence rather than historical trade data alone.

Does Lima Xi work with government agencies directly?

Lima Xi is in early conversations with government and port authority stakeholders as part of its design partner programme. Engagements are scoped individually given the sensitivity of national infrastructure contexts.

Will engagements be made public?

No. We do not publish named government or port authority engagements at this stage. Conversations are handled in confidence.

Start a confidential conversation.

Discuss your corridor or port strategy with the founding team.